{"id":7544,"date":"2025-05-05T13:55:22","date_gmt":"2025-05-05T11:55:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/?p=7544"},"modified":"2025-05-05T13:55:22","modified_gmt":"2025-05-05T11:55:22","slug":"demi-journee-detude-groupe-detudes-de-philosophie-japonaise-samedi-24-mai-2025-paris","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/?p=7544","title":{"rendered":"[Demi-journ\u00e9e d’\u00e9tude] Groupe d’\u00e9tudes de philosophie japonaise, samedi 24 mai 2025, Paris"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Prochaine demi-journ\u00e9e d’\u00e9tude organis\u00e9e par le Groupe d\u2019\u00e9tudes de philosophie japonaise<\/strong> (Institut fran\u00e7ais de recherche sur l\u2019Asie de l\u2019Est, Inalco \/ Universit\u00e9 Paris-Cit\u00e9 \/ CNRS) Samedi 24 mai 2025,<\/strong>\u00a0en pr\u00e9sence et vid\u00e9oconf\u00e9rence sur zoom,\u00a0Amphi 5<\/strong>, 65 rue des Grands Moulins Paris 13e<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

14h00 -15h15 (l\u2019heure au Japon 21h -22h15)
Scott MA\u00a0<\/strong>(University of Zurich), \u00ab\u00a0Angulo and Confucian Settler Colonialisms: A tentative Comparison, with Reference<\/strong> to the Japanese Empir<\/strong>e\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n\n\n\n

15h30-16h45\u00a0
Rapha\u00ebl PIERRES\u00a0<\/strong>(Centre d\u2019Histoire des Philosophies Modernes de la Sorbonne), \u00ab\u00a0Le probl\u00e8me philosophique de la pluralit\u00e9 des grammaires : une confrontation entre Joao Rodrigues et MOTOORI Norinaga<\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

=> Pour le lien Zoom, pri\u00e8re de contacter \u00e0 partir du 21 mai :\u00a0takako.saito@inalco.fr<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coresponsables : <\/strong>EBERSOLT Simon, KURODA Akinobu, KUWAYAMA Yukiko, MITTEAU Arthur, SAIT\u00d4 Takako, STEVENS Bernard, UEHARA Mayuko  <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Contact courriel : <\/strong>takako.saito@inalco.fr<\/strong><\/a>, akinobukuroda@gmail.com<\/strong><\/a>, simon.ebersolt@gmail.com<\/strong><\/a>  <\/strong>arthur.mitteau@univ-amu.fr<\/a>,  yukikokuwayama@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

_______________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Japanese Philosophy Study Group <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(French Institute for Research on East Asia, Inalco \/ Universit\u00e9 Paris-Cit\u00e9 \/ CNRS)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Saturday 24 May 2025,<\/strong> in person and videoconference on zoom, Amphi 5, 65 rue des Grands Moulins Paris 13e <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

2.00 pm – 3.15 pm (Japan time 9.00 pm – 10.15 pm)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 Scott MA <\/strong>(University of Zurich)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 \u201cAngulo and Confucian Settler Colonialisms: A tentative Comparison, with Reference <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 to the Japanese Empire\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

3.30 pm \u2013 4.45 pm (Japan time 10.30 pm – 11.45 pm)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rapha\u00ebl PIERRES <\/strong>(Centre d’Histoire des Philosophies Modernes de la Sorbonne)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 <\/strong>\u201cThe philosophical problem of the plurality of grammars: a confrontation e<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 between Joao Rodrigues and MOTOORI Norinaga\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the Zoom link, please contact from 21 May: takako.saito@inalco.fr<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coresponsables : <\/strong>EBERSOLT Simon, KURODA Akinobu, KUWAYAMA Yukiko, MITTEAU Arthur, SAIT\u00d4 Takako, STEVENS Bernard, UEHARA Mayuko<\/p>\n\n\n\n

_________________________<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

R\u00e9sum\u00e9s <\/strong>: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scott MA \u00ab <\/strong>Angulo and Confucian Settler Colonialisms: A tentative Comparison, with Reference to the Japanese Empire <\/strong>\u00bb<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recent historical scholarship on the Japanese empire has framed it as a form of settler<\/p>\n\n\n\n

colonialism acquired through cooperation and learning from Western examples (Lu 2019;<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Azuma 2019; Hirano 2023; Hennessey 2018). This paper critiques this assumption, arguing (1)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

that a tradition of agrarian, state-directed settler colonialism was already well-established<\/p>\n\n\n\n

within East Asia over thousands of years, independent from Western influence; (2) this tradition<\/p>\n\n\n\n

of \u201cConfucian colonialism\u201d was the primary driver in the political logic explaining proposals to<\/p>\n\n\n\n

colonize Hokkaido across the nineteenth century, before and after the Meiji Restoration; and (3)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

these political traditions continued to be determinative in explaining Japan\u2019s colonial policy<\/p>\n\n\n\n

towards Taiwan after 1895, giving one possible explanation for deviances between Japanese<\/p>\n\n\n\n

and European colonial models, most notably Japan\u2019s consistent eschewing of indirect rule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The presentation provides a bird\u2019s-eye view of this history. It begins by examining the writing of<\/p>\n\n\n\n

the ancient Confucian classics about the relationship between politics and land cultivation. It<\/p>\n\n\n\n

then compares this with a basic understanding of Western settler colonialism, noting the<\/p>\n\n\n\n

substantial points where they agree\u2014the forced assimilation or decimation of indigenous<\/p>\n\n\n\n

peoples, social fantasies projected upon land, and a connection between land reclamation and<\/p>\n\n\n\n

social morality. It also notes important differences, most significantly the omnipresent role of<\/p>\n\n\n\n

the state in Confucian colonialism and the absence of eschatological-theological motivations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This mode of thinking is then shown to explain how Japanese politicians and intellectuals from<\/p>\n\n\n\n

the late eighteenth century across the entirety of the nineteenth understood how the country<\/p>\n\n\n\n

should defend itself from Russian incursions in Hokkaido, its northern frontier\u2014by a two-pronged<\/p>\n\n\n\n

approach, the state-sponsored sending of settlers coupled with the \u201cacculturation\u201d of<\/p>\n\n\n\n

the aboriginal Ainu people. It lastly shifts the focus to Taiwan, showing how this Confucian<\/p>\n\n\n\n

emphasis on cultural assimilation and improvement of \u201cbackwards\u201d border regions was both<\/p>\n\n\n\n

preserved during the colonization of Taiwan and adjusted to suit a modern world order via the<\/p>\n\n\n\n

practice of \u201cscientific colonialism\u201d and the state-sponsored encouragement of economic<\/p>\n\n\n\n

growth under capitalism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rapha\u00ebl PIERRES \u00ab Le probl\u00e8me philosophique de la pluralit\u00e9 des grammaires :<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

une confrontation entre Joao Rodrigues et Motoori Norinaga \u00bb<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nous proposons de reconsid\u00e9rer le probl\u00e8me philosophique du statut de la grammaire \u00e0 l\u2019aune d\u2019une<\/p>\n\n\n\n

histoire compar\u00e9e des grammaires de la premi\u00e8re modernit\u00e9. Notre intervention se concentre sur la<\/p>\n\n\n\n

mise en contraste de l\u2019oeuvre de Norinaga Motoori avec celle de Joao Rodrigues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

De ce point de vue, la mani\u00e8re dont les grammaires j\u00e9suites des langues orientales ont \u00e9t\u00e9<\/p>\n\n\n\n

mobilis\u00e9es, \u00e0 la fois dans les th\u00e9ories des langues au Japon, et dans la philosophie en Europe, est<\/p>\n\n\n\n

d\u00e9cisive pour comprendre la constitution du concept de grammaire, et son usage \u00e9largi dans<\/p>\n\n\n\n

l\u2019\u00e9pist\u00e9mologie contemporaine. Dans une relation tendue \u00e0 la logique, les grammaires ouvrent un<\/p>\n\n\n\n

espace de discours et de savoir, \u00e0 la fois descriptif et prescriptif.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nous proposons ici de nous concentrer sur une relecture philosophique des ouvrages j\u00e9suites et tout<\/p>\n\n\n\n

particuli\u00e8rement de certains aspects du Nihon Daibunten<\/em> (Arte da Lingoa de Iapam, 1604-1608) de<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Joao Rodrigues. D\u2019une part, il y a un \u00e9cart entre la langue japonaise classique et les cat\u00e9gories<\/p>\n\n\n\n

latines utilis\u00e9es par les j\u00e9suites pour les d\u00e9crire : en particulier la structure sujet-verbe-pr\u00e9dicat<\/p>\n\n\n\n

para\u00eet en d\u00e9calage avec la langue japonaise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

D\u2019autre part, une interrogation grammaticale na\u00eet tr\u00e8s t\u00f4t au Japon, dans la prise de conscience de<\/p>\n\n\n\n

l\u2019\u00e9cart entre la langue orale et les caract\u00e8res chinois qui servent \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9crire, et dans la tentative de<\/p>\n\n\n\n

d\u00e9terminer le statut de ce jeu entre langues. Dans ce cadre, nous cherchons plus particuli\u00e8rement \u00e0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

reprendre l\u2019analyse de la contribution de Motoori Norinaga, et les concepts de teniwoha<\/em> et kakarimusubi<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(\u00e9labor\u00e9s en particulier dans Teniwoha Himokagami, 1771 et Kotoba no Tama no O, 1779).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Comment saisir la sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9 de la grammaire japonaise dans son historicit\u00e9, sans alimenter des<\/p>\n\n\n\n

discours exotisants ou nationalistes ? Par l\u00e0, faisant un pas de plus, quel sens philosophique donner<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00e0 la prise en compte de diff\u00e9rences grammaticales effectives ? <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Prochaine demi-journ\u00e9e d’\u00e9tude organis\u00e9e par le Groupe d\u2019\u00e9tudes de philosophie japonaise (Institut fran\u00e7ais de recherche sur l\u2019Asie de l\u2019Est, Inalco \/ Universit\u00e9 Paris-Cit\u00e9 \/ CNRS) Samedi 24 mai 2025,\u00a0en pr\u00e9sence et vid\u00e9oconf\u00e9rence sur zoom,\u00a0Amphi 5, 65 rue des Grands Moulins… Lire la suite<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_EventAllDay":false,"_EventTimezone":"","_EventStartDate":"","_EventEndDate":"","_EventStartDateUTC":"","_EventEndDateUTC":"","_EventShowMap":false,"_EventShowMapLink":false,"_EventURL":"","_EventCost":"","_EventCostDescription":"","_EventCurrencySymbol":"","_EventCurrencyCode":"","_EventCurrencyPosition":"","_EventDateTimeSeparator":"","_EventTimeRangeSeparator":"","_EventOrganizerID":[],"_EventVenueID":[],"_OrganizerEmail":"","_OrganizerPhone":"","_OrganizerWebsite":"","_VenueAddress":"","_VenueCity":"","_VenueCountry":"","_VenueProvince":"","_VenueState":"","_VenueZip":"","_VenuePhone":"","_VenueURL":"","_VenueStateProvince":"","_VenueLat":"","_VenueLng":"","_VenueShowMap":false,"_VenueShowMapLink":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7544","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualites","category-colloque"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7544"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7544\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7545,"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7544\/revisions\/7545"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sfej.asso.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}